利用英文全文数据库——Elsevier 进行文献信息检索
1、检索课题名称：促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究
2、课题分析：
中文关键词为：知识产权管理自主创新
英文关键词为：Intellectual property management Independent innovation
3、选择检索工具：Elsevier 数据库
4、构建检索策略：Intellectual property managementANDIndependent innovation
5、简述检索过程:
选定在Elsevier 中期刊、图书、文摘数据库等全部文献资源中检索2000年以后的相关文献。
利用确定的检索策略（Intellectual property managementANDIndependent innovation ），文献全文（含文献题目、摘要、关键词）中检索，检到6605篇相关文献；
检索2005年以后的相关文献，文献全文（含文献题目、摘要、关键词）中检索，检到5390篇相关文献；
6、整理检索结果：
从以上文献中选择出3条切题文献
1. Drivers of innovation capital disclosure in intellectual capitalstatements:Evidence from Europeq
Lucia Bellora*,Thomas W. Guenther
Technische Universit?t Dresden (TUDresden), Faculty of Business Management and Economics, Chair of Business Management, esp.
Management Accounting and Control, D-01062Dresden, Germany
Abstract
Innovation is one of the major determinants of competitive success. As a result, there is demand for information on the innovation activities of firms among investors, other
stakeholders and the public. Using content analysis, this paper examines the innovation
capital disclosure (INCD)characteristics (i.e.disclosure quantity and quality) in the intellectual capital statements (ICS)of 51European for-profit firms. Additionally, the relationships between INCD characteristics and industry, firm size, region of registered office
and the disclosure guidelines adopted are analysed. Our content analysis detects an
average of 29.16items on innovation capital (INC)per ICS. These are mainly qualitative, non-financial and historically orientated. Furthermore, as expected, industry, firm size,
region and disclosure guidelines drive the quantity of disclosure. Prior empirical studies of voluntary disclosure in documents other than ICS have also suggested a relationship between firm size and disclosure quality. Interestingly, our results for INCD in ICS do not
support this relationship. This provides tentative evidence for a similar qualitative level of innovation capital disclosure across firm size. Furthermore, our findings show mostly
homogeneous disclosure patterns across the regions in Europe, suggesting that multinational efforts towards fostering INCD has made the ICS phenomenon more a European than
a local phenomenon.
Keywords:
Content analysis
Disclosure
Innovation capital
Intellectual capital statements
2. International low carbon technology transfer:Do intellectual property
regimes matter?
Varun Rai a,b,*,Kaye Schultz a, Erik Funkhouser a
a LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, United States
b Mechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, United States Abstract
Transfer of low carbon technologies to developing countries has been recognized as important in global efforts to limit climate change. Yet the mechanics of international technology transfer, especially around intellectual property rights, have remained a controversial issue in international negotiations. Using a new dataset on international partnerships in China and India in three key low carbon technologies—solarphotovoltaics, electric vehicles, and coal gasification/integratedgasification combined cycle—andcomplementary expert interviews we study the dynamics of the transfer of intellectual property and the underlying drivers that guide the development of business strategies and partnerships in the context of transitioning intellectual property regimes in emerging markets. We find that weak intellectual property regimes are indeed a hindrance to the diffusion of certain classes of low carbon technologies:(i)for cutting-edge technologies, (ii)for fully-embodied (explicitlycodified) technologies, and (iii)for small firms. However, we also find that intellectual property issues do not represent a barrier to the diffusion of the relatively mature and low to medium cost low carbon technologies that are materially (atscale) most important for carbon dioxide emissions reduction in the short to medium term. Competitive technology supply, shifting market dynamics, and increasingly vigorous domestic innovation coupled with mechanisms and opportunities to structure credible intellectual property deals allow for the diffusion of key low carbon technologies to occur within the context of existing business, political, and institutional structures.
Article history:Received 10May 2013Received in revised form 2October 2013Accepted 8October 2013
Keywords:
Technology transfer
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Diffusion of innovations
Absorptive capacity
National innovation system
3. Key factors for the successful evaluation and screening of managers of the
intellectual property rights speciality
Ming-Kuen Wang ?, Kevin P. Hwang
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC
Abstract ：
This research uses the analytical hierarchy process (AHP)to analyze the key factors in evaluating and
screening managers of the intellectual property rights speciality in Taiwan, related to industry. Industry
can utilize the key factors of human resource management to provide self-growth and obtain competitive
advantage opportunities for expanding the global market share. This research summarizes the evaluation
and screening criteria of managers of the intellectual property rights speciality via a questionnaire of 29
managerial or technical staff from the IP rights-related industries, technology or management experts
from the governmental departments related to IP rights industries, and scholars with backgrounds in
IP rights related industries who had actually participated in IP rights managers speciality decisions or
related tasks and who had employed AHP screening criteria. The findings include three key factors in
evaluating and screening the managers’speciality:evaluating IP rights competency, locating the core patent
group competency, and calculating the chance of patents to be granted competency. This research can
provide a reference for Taiwan’srelated industry, when evaluating and screening managers of the IP
rights speciality.
Keywords:
Analytical hierarchy process
Evaluation and screening
Key factor
Managers of intellectual property rights
speciality
6、全文摘录选择一篇：1. Drivers of innovation capital disclosure in intellectual capitalstatements:Evidence from Europeq
一、篇名Drivers of innovation capital disclosure in intellectual capital
statements:Evidence from Europeq
二、著者Lucia Bellora*,Thomas W. Guenther
三、著者机构Technische Universit?t Dresden (TUDresden), Faculty of Business Management and Economics, Chair of Business Management, esp.
Management Accounting and Control, D-01062Dresden, Germany
Barcelona, Spain Received 18December 2003? accepted 26July 2004
四、文摘Innovation is one of the major determinants of competitive success. As a result, there is demand for information on the innovation activities of firms among investors, other
stakeholders and the public. Using content analysis, this paper examines the innovation
capital disclosure (INCD)characteristics (i.e.disclosure quantity and quality) in the intellectual capital statements (ICS)of 51European for-profit firms. Additionally, the relationships between INCD characteristics and industry, firm size, region of registered office
and the disclosure guidelines adopted are analysed. Our content analysis detects an
average of 29.16items on innovation capital (INC)per ICS. These are mainly qualitative,
non-financial and historically orientated. Furthermore, as expected, industry, firm size,
region and disclosure guidelines drive the quantity of disclosure. Prior empirical studies of voluntary disclosure in documents other than ICS have also suggested a relationship between firm size and disclosure quality. Interestingly, our results for INCD in ICS do not
support this relationship. This provides tentative evidence for a similar qualitative level of innovation capital disclosure across firm size. Furthermore, our findings show mostly
homogeneous disclosure patterns across the regions in Europe, suggesting that multinational efforts towards fostering INCD has made the ICS phenomenon more a European than
a local phenomenon.
五、关键词Keywords:Content analysis
Disclosure
Innovation capital
Intellectual capital statements
六、正文
1. Introduction and objectives （首段）
Innovation capital (INC)is that part of the intellectual capital of a firm that describes the ability of a firm to generate and
use innovative solutions, and related results in terms of intellectual property rights and other tangible, intangible and
financial assets (Edvinsson&Malone, 1997). The transformation of western economies from an industrial to a knowledgebased
structure increases the relevance of INC. On a macro-economic level, innovation has become a major driver of economic
growth, while traditional growth enhancers such as investment in physical assets are declining in importance (OECD,
2010). On a micro-economic level, innovations are recognised as means of gaining competitive advantage and higher returns
(Bowen,Rostami, &Steel, 2010).
（末段）Our findings also have implications for policy and practice. First, small firms especially may identify ICS as instruments
adequate for meeting the demand for INCD, as can be seen from the overall use of INCD items in the sample ICS. Second,
policymakers may achieve insights into current disclosure practices on INC and find ways to further improve policymaking.
For example, policymakers in Nordic countries could recognise in their data the necessity to increase the
disclosure of INC in order to increase the perception of their economies’innovativeness. Finally, guideline-setters may
recognise that further efforts are needed in order to satisfy the call for homogenisation in disclosure guidelines and thus
in disclosure behaviour.
七、参考文献References
Abdolmohammadi, M. (2005).
Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe:legitimating corporate behaviour? The
British
Accounting Review, 30(1),1–21.
AICPA. (1994).Improving business reporting –A customer focus:Meeting information needs of investors and creditors. Jersey City:AICPA.
April, K. A., Bosma, P., &Deglon, D. (2003).Intellectual capital measurement and reporting:establishing a practice in South African mining. Journal of
Intellectual Capital, 4(2),165–180.
Austrian Ministry of Science and Research. (2002).University act. Available on the internet at http://www.bmwf.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/wissenschaft/
recht/englisch/E_UG.pdfAccessed 04.07.10.
Austrian Research Centers. (2000).Intellectual capital report 1999, research report of the Austrian Research Centers. Seibersdorf:Austrian Research Centers.
Backhuijs, J. B., Holterman, W. G. M., Oudman, R. S., Overgoor, R. P. M., &Zijlstra, S. M. (1999).Reporting on intangible assets, final report for the benefit of the
Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and the intangible assets pilot project sounding board group. Amsterdam:Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Beattie, V., &Thomson, S. J. (2007).Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosure. Accounting Forum, 31(2),129–163.
Beretta, S., &Bozzolan, S. (2008).
利用英文全文数据库——EBSCO(BSP/ASP)进行文献信息检索
1、检索课题名称：促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究
2、课题分析：
中文关键词为：知识产权管理自主创新
英文关键词为：Intellectual property management Independent innovation
3、选择检索工具：EBSCO(BSP/ASP)数据库
4、构建检索策略：Intellectual property management AND Independent innovation
5、简述检索过程:
选定在EBSCO(BSP/ASP)中xt all text 等全部文献资源中检索, 利用确定的检索策略（Intellectual property management AND Independent innovation ）, 检到34篇相关文献；
6、整理检索结果：
从以上文献中选择出3条切题文献
1、IP Modularity:PROFITING FROM INNOVATION BY ALIGNING PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE WITH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Joachim Henkel Carliss Y. Baldwin Willy Shih
Abstract
Firms seeking to take advantage of distributed innovation and outsourcing can bridge the tension between value creation and value capture by modifying the modular structure of their technical systems. Specifically, this article introduces the concept of “IPmodularity,”which seeks to protect and capture value from intellectual property. The article defines what it means for a system to be “IP-modular,”illustrates the application of this concept in a number of practical situations, and presents a comprehensive framework that can be used to design and evaluate value capture strategies for modular systems. (Keywords:Modularity, Value Appropriation, Distributed Innovation, Open Innovation, Intellectual Property)
2、INNOVATION MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES OF A
SYSTEM INTEGRATOR IN INNOVATION NETWORKS
JAAKKO PAASI ，KATRI VALKOKARI and TUIJA RANTALA
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
P.O. Box 1300, FI-33101Tampere, Finland
HENRI HYTÖNEN
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044VTT, Finland
SOILI NYSTÉN-HAARALAy and LAURA HUHTILAINEN
University of Eastern Finland
P.O. Box 111, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
Abstract
The paper describes findings from a multiple case study about the innovation management challenges of a system integrator (SI)whose operation is characterized by a high demand of innovation and whose focus of integration capabilities is, accordingly, changing from
component assembly to knowledge integration. The study involved six diverse case firms, and it applied the methodology of qualitative research. Innovation networks orchestrated
by the SI were categorized, according to the way in which knowledge and intellectual
property (IP)were explored and exploited in the network, to sourcing (transaction)and co-creation types of networks. The research question of the study was, what aspects of
sourcing networks and of co-creation networks support or hinder networked innovation from the viewpoint of a SI and innovation management? After iteratively addressing the
lessons learned from literature and empirical case findings, sets of supporting and hindering aspects were presented as implications of the study.
Keywords:Open innovation; innovation network; system integrator; innovation management; intellectual property.
3、ADOPTING INNOVATION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE IN UNIVERSITY INNOVATION COMMERCIALIZATIOnN
INDRIT TROSHANI
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
GISEllE RAMPERSAD
Flinders University
Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
CAROlIN PlEWA
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Abstract
Despite the growing prominence of innovation, limited studies have examined the adoption of information systems that support innovation processes. This study investigates the organizational adoption of an innovation management software. It is based on a case study which incorporates a focus group and sixteen in-depth interviews across R&D,marketing, and administration functions. It contributes to current literature by isolating specific intrinsic characteristics of innovation management software, including communication/informationflow, accessibility, and accountability, and how these can jointly shape organizational motivations and capabilities as
innovation organizations respond to environmental pressures, including innovation partners’influence, competition, and regulation. Managerial implications for enhancing the adoption of innovation management software are also offered.
keywords:
innovation, adoption, case study.
6、全文摘录选择一篇：2. INNOVATION MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES OF A SYSTEM INTEGRATOR IN INNOVATION NETWORKS
一、篇名INNOVATION MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES OF A
SYSTEM INTEGRATOR IN INNOVATION NETWORKS
二、著者JAAKKO PAASI, KATRI VALKOKARI and TUIJA RANTALA
HENRI HYTÖNEN
SOILI NYSTÉN-HAARALAand LAURA HUHTILAINEN
三、著者机构International Journal of Innovation Management. Dec2010, Vol. 14Issue 6, p1047-1064. 18p.
四、文摘The paper describes findings from a multiple case study about the innovation management challenges of a system integrator (SI)whose operation is characterized by a high demand
of innovation and whose focus of integration capabilities is, accordingly, changing from
component assembly to knowledge integration. The study involved six diverse case firms, and it applied the methodology of qualitative research. Innovation networks orchestrated by the SI were categorized, according to the way in which knowledge and intellectual
property (IP)were explored and exploited in the network, to sourcing (transaction)and co-creation types of networks. The research question of the study was, what aspects of
sourcing networks and of co-creation networks support or hinder networked innovation from the viewpoint of a SI and innovation management? After iteratively addressing the
lessons learned from literature and empirical case findings, sets of supporting and hindering aspects were presented as implications of the study.
五、关键词Keywords:Open innovation; innovation network; system integrator; innovation management; intellectual property
六、正文
1. Introduction and objectives （首段）
Since the 1990s, there has been a strong trend towards outsourcing in Western companies. Outsourcing is nowadays used for a variety of activities, including core processes such as new product development. Global corporations are typically seeking a few suppliers from whom to buy more complete and complex systems or subsystems. Accordingly, the locus of competition through innovation has been shifting from discrete product innovations to innovations in increasingly complex products, and also then to the design and development process of these complex products itself (Pavitt,2002).Such complex products often consist of pieces from various suppliers put together by an actor called system integrator (SI)(Hobdayet al.,2005) （末段）Further studies of the innovation management challenges of SIs in innovation networks should therefore focus on sectoral analyses (andconsider similarities between product system integration and high-volume system integration in the automotive and consumer electronics industries), as well as to broaden the perspective beyond innovation management to a wider viewpoint of business management.
七、参考文献References
Argyres, N and K Mayer (2007).Contract design as a
firm capability:An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives.
Academy of Management Review , 32,
1060–1077.
Arora, A, A Fosfuri and A Gambardella (2001).
Markets for Technology:The Economics
of Innovation and Corporate Strategy
. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Axelrod, RM (1984).
The Evolution of Cooperation
. Basic Books, New York.
Becker M, PH Johnson and N Ruijsenaars (2003).
Collaborative Product Development—CaseStudy within the Swedish Automotive Industry. Lund Institute of Technology,
Lund. Brusoni, SA, A Prencipe and K Pavitt (2001).Sharing intellectual property rights—anexploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 1035–1050.
Hanel, P (2006).Intellectual property rights business management practices:A survey of the literature. Technovation
, 26, 895–931.Hobday,M, A Davies and A Prencipe (2005).Systems integration:A core capability of
the modern corporation,
Industrial and Corporate Change
, 14, 1109–1143.Jarimo,T (2008).
Innovation Incentives and the Design of Value Networks
. D.Sc. Thesis.
Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo.
Järvensivu,T and K Möller(2009).Metatheory of network management:A contingency perspective,Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 654–661.Lambert,M (1983).Long-term Contracts and Moral Hazard.
Bell Journal of Economics,14, 441–452.
Lee, N (2009).Exclusion and coordination in collaborative innovation and patent law, International Journal of Intellectual Property Management,3,79–93.
Leiponen, A (2008).